Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McFARLAND v. NESTLE USA, INC., 3:16CV00100 JLH. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160817717 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The joint motion to stay deadlines pending resolution of settlement discussions is GRANTED. Document #13. The existing deadlines are hereby stayed, including the deadlines for the defendants to respond to the plaintiff's motion to certify class, the parties' Rule 26 conference, and the submission of a joint preliminary planning report. This stay will be in effect through September 9, 2016, to permit the parties to attempt to resolve this case. Should
More

ORDER

The joint motion to stay deadlines pending resolution of settlement discussions is GRANTED. Document #13. The existing deadlines are hereby stayed, including the deadlines for the defendants to respond to the plaintiff's motion to certify class, the parties' Rule 26 conference, and the submission of a joint preliminary planning report. This stay will be in effect through September 9, 2016, to permit the parties to attempt to resolve this case. Should the parties be unable to settle this matter by September 9, the parties must either (a) file a status report and request an extension of the stay if settlement is feasible but will take more time, or (b) inform the Court that further negotiations would not be productive. In the latter event, the parties must file their Rule 26(f) report within seven days after the stay is lifted, and the defendants must file a response to the plaintiff's motion to certify class within twenty-one days after the stay is lifted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer