JONES v. ST. CLAIR COUNTY, 3:13-00650-JPG-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140918926
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PHILIP M. FRAZIER, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is plaintiff Rufus Jones' motion for an order finding certain defendants in violation of a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 125). Plaintiff suggests that a recent arrest was motivated by retaliation for litigation rather than a charge of domestic battery and that his arrest violates a preliminary injunction forbidding retaliation. Plaintiff has not identified a preliminary injunction either by the date entered or
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PHILIP M. FRAZIER, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is plaintiff Rufus Jones' motion for an order finding certain defendants in violation of a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 125). Plaintiff suggests that a recent arrest was motivated by retaliation for litigation rather than a charge of domestic battery and that his arrest violates a preliminary injunction forbidding retaliation. Plaintiff has not identified a preliminary injunction either by the date entered or d..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PHILIP M. FRAZIER, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Rufus Jones' motion for an order finding certain defendants in violation of a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 125). Plaintiff suggests that a recent arrest was motivated by retaliation for litigation rather than a charge of domestic battery and that his arrest violates a preliminary injunction forbidding retaliation. Plaintiff has not identified a preliminary injunction either by the date entered or document number, and none can be located in the Clerk's records. The motion lacks merit.
IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for a finding that certain defendants violated a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 125) be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
