Johnson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 3:18-cv-00059. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190507c27
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 12), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 11), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DECISION, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 12) filed by Plaintiff Terrance Johnson ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 11). Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that the Ad
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 12), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 11), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DECISION, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 12) filed by Plaintiff Terrance Johnson ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 11). Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that the Adm..
More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 12), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 11), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DECISION, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 12) filed by Plaintiff Terrance Johnson ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 11). Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that the Administrative Law Judge's non-disability decision be affirmed. Plaintiff filed Objections (Doc. 12) to the Report, and the Commissioner responded to the Objections (Doc. 13). This matter is therefore ripe for review.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 12) to the Report are not well-taken and are OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 11) and rules as follows:
1. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record and is AFFIRMED; and
2. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
