SQUARE v. ASTRUE, CV 111-038. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120521660
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accor
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accord..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with the Court's opinion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
