REEVES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:13-CV-00325. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140620e03
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 18), to which there were no objections. The Magistrate Judge reviewed the record and determined that both a Sentence Four and Sentence Six Remand is appropriate under Section 405(g), for consideration of new evidence submitted after the ALJ's decision, and because all of the essential factual issues have not been resolved ( Id. ). Proper Notice has been giv
Summary: ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 18), to which there were no objections. The Magistrate Judge reviewed the record and determined that both a Sentence Four and Sentence Six Remand is appropriate under Section 405(g), for consideration of new evidence submitted after the ALJ's decision, and because all of the essential factual issues have not been resolved ( Id. ). Proper Notice has been give..
More
ORDER
S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 18), to which there were no objections. The Magistrate Judge reviewed the record and determined that both a Sentence Four and Sentence Six Remand is appropriate under Section 405(g), for consideration of new evidence submitted after the ALJ's decision, and because all of the essential factual issues have not been resolved (Id.).
Proper Notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in all respects (doc. 18), REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further proceedings. The Court further REMANDS this matter pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for consideration of the evidence added to the record after the ALJ's decision.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
