PACKETT v. WALTON, 14-cv-606-CJP. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160412a20
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM and ORDER CLIFFORD J. PROUD , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Douglas A. Packett was an inmate in the BOP at the time he filed his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. However, mail recently sent to petitioner has been returned as undeliverable. See, Doc. 19. According to the BOP's website, petitioner has been transferred from USP-Marion to the custody of the Residential Reentry Management Office in Kansas City. 2 In its order on preliminary review, the Court
Summary: MEMORANDUM and ORDER CLIFFORD J. PROUD , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Douglas A. Packett was an inmate in the BOP at the time he filed his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. However, mail recently sent to petitioner has been returned as undeliverable. See, Doc. 19. According to the BOP's website, petitioner has been transferred from USP-Marion to the custody of the Residential Reentry Management Office in Kansas City. 2 In its order on preliminary review, the Court ..
More
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
CLIFFORD J. PROUD, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner Douglas A. Packett was an inmate in the BOP at the time he filed his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. However, mail recently sent to petitioner has been returned as undeliverable. See, Doc. 19.
According to the BOP's website, petitioner has been transferred from USP-Marion to the custody of the Residential Reentry Management Office in Kansas City.2
In its order on preliminary review, the Court warned Packett of the consequences of failure to keep the Court informed of his whereabouts:
Petitioner is ADVISED of his continuing obligation to keep the Clerk (and each opposing party) informed of any change in his whereabouts during the pendency of this action. This notification shall be done in writing and not later than seven (7) days after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to provide such notice may result in dismissal of this action. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
Doc. 3, p. 2.
Clearly, petitioner has not kept the Court informed of his whereabouts. This Court gave petitioner the "warning shot" required by Ball v. City of Chicago, 2 F.3d 752, 755 (7th Cir. 1993) in Doc. 5. Pursuant to Johnson v. Chicago Board of Education, 718 F.3d 731 (7th Cir. 2013), the Court has considered whether a sanction short of dismissal of this case might be fruitful, and finds that it would not.
Conclusion
This cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). See, Doc. 15.
2. http://www.bop.gov/Locate/, visited on April 11, 2016.
Source: Leagle
