Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. MATLACK, 3:15cr50/MCR. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20160111b23 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2015
Summary: PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . WHEREAS, in the indictment in the above-entitled action, the United States sought forfeiture of all property of the defendant, ROBERT F. MATLACK, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2428 and 1594, as property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from the violations set forth in said indictment and/or property used or intended to be used to commit or promote the commission
More

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, in the indictment in the above-entitled action, the United States sought forfeiture of all property of the defendant, ROBERT F. MATLACK, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2428 and 1594, as property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from the violations set forth in said indictment and/or property used or intended to be used to commit or promote the commission of the offenses set forth in Counts One and Two of said indictment;

AND WHEREAS, on or about December 10, 2015, defendant ROBERT F. MATLACK was found guilty by a jury of the violations set forth in Counts One and Two of the indictment, and has now consented to forfeiture with regard to the defendant's interest in the specifically below noted property;

AND WHEREAS, by virtue of said verdict and concession of forfeiture, the United States is now entitled to possession of said property, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2428 and 1594 and Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; now wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That all of defendant's right and interest in the property described below is hereby forfeited to and vested in the United States of America.

2. That the property which is subject to forfeiture in this Order is as follows:

a. Samsung Galaxy Note II cellular telephone (Samsung-SGH-1317)

3. That an order of preliminary forfeiture is hereby entered in favor of the United States against defendant ROBERT F. MATLACK pursuant to Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer