Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FURNACE v. NUCKLES, C 09-6075 MMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141021j05 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR OCTOBER 17, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Edward T. Furnace ("Plaintiff") and Defendants K. Nuckles, J.J. Rodriguez, W. Rasley, D. Bittner, J. Celaya, J. Rodriguez, A. Butt, R. Lipps, M. Kircher, J. Sensel, M. Atchley, J. Mora, O. Ponce, and J. Delaney (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree, under Local Rule 7-12,
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR OCTOBER 17, 2014

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Edward T. Furnace ("Plaintiff") and Defendants K. Nuckles, J.J. Rodriguez, W. Rasley, D. Bittner, J. Celaya, J. Rodriguez, A. Butt, R. Lipps, M. Kircher, J. Sensel, M. Atchley, J. Mora, O. Ponce, and J. Delaney (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree, under Local Rule 7-12, to the filing of this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Settlement Conference Set for October 17, 2014.

WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, in connection with its summary judgment ruling, this Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Vadas for settlement talks and entered a stay of further proceedings;

WHEREAS, the parties participated in settlement conferences in November 2013 and March 2014, but the case did not settle;

WHEREAS, at a status conference on July 22, 2014, Judge Vadas set a further settlement conference for October 17, 2014 at 1:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the Court modified the stay to allow Plaintiff Edward T. Furnace to file a motion to compel to resolve discovery disputes;

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2014, Mr. Furnace filed a Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and noticed the motion for hearing on November 18, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Laporte; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree that further settlement discussions will not be productive until the Court rules on the Motion to Compel.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, to continue the further settlement conference currently set for October 17, 2014 to a date after December 18, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION OF FILING

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, Katherine L. Wawrzyniak, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying the Stay for the Limited Purpose of Resolving Discovery Disputes under L.R. 7-12 has been obtained from Defendant's counsel, Michael Quinn.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Settlement Conference Set for October 17, 2014, submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing:

1. The Stipulation is approved; 2. The parties are hereby DIRECTED to contact Judge Vadas to request a specific date for the further settlement conference.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer