Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 18-cv-1121-pp. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20190401669 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DKT. NO. 26) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On March 25, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation, asking the court to enter an order awarding attorneys' fees and expenses. Dkt. No. 26. The court APPROVES the stipulation for award under the EAJA. Dkt. No. 26. The court ORDERS that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $7,600.00, in full satisfaction and settleme
More

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DKT. NO. 26)

On March 25, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation, asking the court to enter an order awarding attorneys' fees and expenses. Dkt. No. 26.

The court APPROVES the stipulation for award under the EAJA. Dkt. No. 26. The court ORDERS that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $7,600.00, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims the plaintiff may have in this case under the EAJA. The court awards these fees and costs to the plaintiff, not the plaintiff's attorney, and under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the United States may offset the award to satisfy pre-existing debts that the litigant owes the United States.

If counsel for the parties verify that the plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, the defendant shall direct that the award be made payable to the plaintiff's attorney, pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by the plaintiff and counsel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer