Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CRAWFORD, CR 116-088. (2017)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20170315b87 Visitors: 47
Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Counsel in the above-captioned case have advised the Court that all pretrial motions have been satisfied or otherwise resolved. ( See doc. no. 26.) Therefore, a motions hearing for Defendant is not necessary, and all pending motions are MOOT . (Doc. nos. 14-1, 14-2, 15, 16, 17-1, 17-2, 18, 19.) SO ORDERED.

ORDER

Counsel in the above-captioned case have advised the Court that all pretrial motions have been satisfied or otherwise resolved. (See doc. no. 26.) Therefore, a motions hearing for Defendant is not necessary, and all pending motions are MOOT. (Doc. nos. 14-1, 14-2, 15, 16, 17-1, 17-2, 18, 19.)

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer