Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) issued by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub on February 21, 2013, on the motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 13, 17) filed by Plaintiff and Defendant. Judge Majzoub recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion, deny Defendant's motion, reverse the Commissioner's decision, and rema
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) issued by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub on February 21, 2013, on the motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 13, 17) filed by Plaintiff and Defendant. Judge Majzoub recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion, deny Defendant's motion, reverse the Commissioner's decision, and reman..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) issued by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub on February 21, 2013, on the motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 13, 17) filed by Plaintiff and Defendant. Judge Majzoub recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion, deny Defendant's motion, reverse the Commissioner's decision, and remand the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Any party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. The Court is not obligated to review the portions of the report to which no objection was made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder's report and recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Majzoub's report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and the case is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
