Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Elite Health Centers, Inc., 2:16-cv-13040. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190327789 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER RESOLVING STATE FARM MUTUAL'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ANTONIO SPRATT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT (DE 379), VACATING THE SHOW CAUSE ORDER (DE 414), AND ORDERING ANTONIO SPRATT TO APPEAR FOR HIS DEPOSITION ANTHONY P. PATTI , Magistrate Judge . On or about January 10, 2019, Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") filed a motion to show cause against non-party Antonio Spratt ("Spratt") for his failure to: (a) appear at his October 30, 2
More

ORDER RESOLVING STATE FARM MUTUAL'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ANTONIO SPRATT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT (DE 379), VACATING THE SHOW CAUSE ORDER (DE 414), AND ORDERING ANTONIO SPRATT TO APPEAR FOR HIS DEPOSITION

On or about January 10, 2019, Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") filed a motion to show cause against non-party Antonio Spratt ("Spratt") for his failure to: (a) appear at his October 30, 2018 deposition; and, (b) produce documents pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum. (DE 379.) On March 8, 2019, the Court entered an order directing State Farm and Spratt to appear before the Court for a show cause hearing on State Farm's motion, at which Spratt had to explain why he should not be held in contempt. (DE 414.)

On the date set for the show cause hearing, Antonio Spratt and counsel for State Farm and the Elite Defendants appeared in my courtroom. Spratt stated that he has been attempting to secure representation, and that he had been informed that a stay had been entered in this case. Counsel for the Elite Defendants confirmed that Spratt had contacted him about representing him in this matter, and that he had previously informed Spratt about the stay. Spratt has had a total of five months in which to secure representation, and the November 16, 2018 stay was lifted on January 8, 2019. He agreed that he will attend his deposition as ordered, with or without representation, and that he will search for documents responsive to the subpoena served on him.

In light of Spratt's communications with counsel in an attempt to secure representation in this matter, as well as the prior stay in this matter, the Court believes that a finding of contempt is not warranted at this time; however, Antonio Spratt is ORDERED to appear for his deposition on April 2, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. at the law offices of Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, 150 W. Jefferson, Suite 2500, Detroit, Michigan 48226. Spratt is further ORDERED to search for and produce, by April 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., all documents within his possession, custody or control responsive to the requests in the subpoena for documents served on August 9, 2018. Failure to comply with this Order may result in an order holding Spratt in civil contempt.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer