ANDERSON v. COLVIN, 1:13-CV-70 (WLS). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140620b65
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed April 29, 2014. (Doc. 12.) It is recommended that the Social Security Commissioner's final decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for a full consideration of all medical opinions in the record and an evaluation of Plaintiff's credibility, thereafter. (Doc. 12 at 7.) Judge Langstaff also recommended that, on r
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed April 29, 2014. (Doc. 12.) It is recommended that the Social Security Commissioner's final decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for a full consideration of all medical opinions in the record and an evaluation of Plaintiff's credibility, thereafter. (Doc. 12 at 7.) Judge Langstaff also recommended that, on re..
More
ORDER
W. LOUIS SANDS, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed April 29, 2014. (Doc. 12.) It is recommended that the Social Security Commissioner's final decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a full consideration of all medical opinions in the record and an evaluation of Plaintiff's credibility, thereafter. (Doc. 12 at 7.) Judge Langstaff also recommended that, on remand, the ALJ be required to include all of Plaintiff's limitations in setting forth hypotheticals to any Vocational Expert. (Id.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on May 16, 2014.1 (See Doc. 12 at 7; Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 12) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court REVERSES and REMANDS the Commissioner's final decision for additional findings consistent with this Order.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).
Source: Leagle
