Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Integrated Construction, LLC v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, 3:19-cv-766-J-34JBT. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190719963 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Amended Notice of Removal (Doc. 9; Amended Notice), filed July 15, 2019. In a previous Order (Doc. 5; Order), the Court reviewed Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. 1; Notice), and concluded that it was unable to determine whether it had diversity jurisdiction over the action, as asserted by Defendants. See Order. In particular, the Court noted that Defendant improperly alleged the citizenship o
More

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Amended Notice of Removal (Doc. 9; Amended Notice), filed July 15, 2019. In a previous Order (Doc. 5; Order), the Court reviewed Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. 1; Notice), and concluded that it was unable to determine whether it had diversity jurisdiction over the action, as asserted by Defendants. See Order. In particular, the Court noted that Defendant improperly alleged the citizenship of Plaintiff, Integrated Construction, LLC. Accordingly, the Court ordered Defendant to provide the Court with sufficient information to establish diversity of citizenship between the parties. Id. at 4.

In its Amended Notice, Defendant states that Integrated Construction's members included Pentax, LLC, and 4M Constructors, Inc. Amended Notice at 3. Defendant properly identified the citizenship of 4M Constructors. Id. In detailing the citizenship of Pentax, LLC, Defendant stated that that its sole member was "Todd B. Zona, a resident of Fernandina Beach, establishing Pentax as a Florida citizen." Id. at 3-4 (emphasis added). The information Defendant provided regarding Zona is insufficient for the Court to establish that there is complete diversity among the parties.

To establish diversity over a natural person, a complaint or notice of removal must include allegations of the person's citizenship, not where he or she resides. See Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1367 (11th Cir. 1994). A natural person's citizenship is determined by his or her "domicile," or "the place of his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment . . . to which he has the intention of returning whenever he is absent therefrom." McCormick v. Aderholt, 293 F.3d 1254, 1257-58 (11th Cir. 2002) (quotation and citation omitted).

Because the Amended Notice discloses Zona's residence, rather than his domicile, the Court finds that Defendant has not alleged the facts necessary to establish the Court's jurisdiction over this case. "Citizenship, not residence, is the key fact that must be alleged in the complaint to establish diversity for a natural person." Taylor, 30 F.3d at 1367 (emphasis supplied); see also Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 48 (1989) ("`[d]omicile' is not necessarily synonymous with `residence'").

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Defendant's Amended Notice of Removal (Doc. 9) is STRICKEN. 2. Defendant shall file a second amended notice of removal curing the jurisdictional deficiencies on or before August 1, 2019. Failure to do so may result in a dismissal of this action.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer