ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES v. PENA, 2:16-CV-294-RMP. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20161004g41
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40. The Court has reviewed the motion, the record, and is fully informed. Plaintiff objects to the Court's ruling allowing Defendants an additional opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's overlength Reply Brief, arguing that no new issues were raised in the Reply and that Defendants have failed to adhere to the word-count limits imposed by th
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40. The Court has reviewed the motion, the record, and is fully informed. Plaintiff objects to the Court's ruling allowing Defendants an additional opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's overlength Reply Brief, arguing that no new issues were raised in the Reply and that Defendants have failed to adhere to the word-count limits imposed by the..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40. The Court has reviewed the motion, the record, and is fully informed.
Plaintiff objects to the Court's ruling allowing Defendants an additional opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's overlength Reply Brief, arguing that no new issues were raised in the Reply and that Defendants have failed to adhere to the word-count limits imposed by the Local Rules. See ECF No. 40. The Court granted Defendants an additional response in conjunction with its ruling that allowed Plaintiff to file its overlength Reply Brief, which, the Court notes, is longer than the initial Memorandum in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (not including the supporting affidavits). See ECF No. 12. The Court imposed reasonable limits on Defendants' ability to respond and Plaintiff still has the final word. Therefore, the Court finds no good cause to reconsider its prior order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40, is DENIED.
The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to counsel.
Source: Leagle
