Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GROSSMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 3:14-CV-03557-VC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150312815 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES THAT: 1. At a Case Management Conference of February 10, 2015 this Court set a hearing on Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue for April 2, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 17 of the above-entitled Court, in the following cases: • Karyn Joy Grossman v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 3:14-CV-03557-V
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES THAT:

1. At a Case Management Conference of February 10, 2015 this Court set a hearing on Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue for April 2, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 17 of the above-entitled Court, in the following cases:

• Karyn Joy Grossman v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 3:14-CV-03557-VC1; • Simon Lampard, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 3:14-CV-04983-VC; and • Geraldine Beverly v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 3:14-CV-05246-VC.

2. Following the Case Management Conference, Defendants' counsel learned of a conflict on April 2, 2015 which would prevent attendance at the hearing on April 2, 2015 (see Declaration of Sarah E. Johnston at ¶ 3);

3. The Parties agree that the Motion to Transfer Venue can be heard on April 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 17 Courtroom 4 of the above-entitled Court, in accordance with Judge Chhabria's civil law and motion rules;

4. No other scheduling modification has been issued on this Motion, either by stipulation or by Court order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I, Sarah E. Johnston, hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories to this document.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 23, 2015 at Los Angeles, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having read considered the Parties' Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to transfer Venue and accompanying Declaration of Sarah e, Johnston, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The instant Stipulation applies to the Grossman action but identical Stipulation will be filed in all three actions
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer