Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . The defendants, Nancy Zavala, Adrian Ruben Santia Zarate, and Jose Nilo, have moved to continue the trial (filing nos. 53, 54, and 55). The motions to continue are unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motions, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motions should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The defendants' unopposed motions to continue trial (filing nos. 53, 54 and 55) are gran
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . The defendants, Nancy Zavala, Adrian Ruben Santia Zarate, and Jose Nilo, have moved to continue the trial (filing nos. 53, 54, and 55). The motions to continue are unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motions, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motions should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The defendants' unopposed motions to continue trial (filing nos. 53, 54 and 55) are grant..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
The defendants, Nancy Zavala, Adrian Ruben Santia Zarate, and Jose Nilo, have moved to continue the trial (filing nos. 53, 54, and 55). The motions to continue are unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motions, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motions should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The defendants' unopposed motions to continue trial (filing nos. 53, 54 and 55) are granted.
2) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in the Special Proceedings Courtroom of the United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on September 4, 2018, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called for 3 days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of these motions, that is, the time between today's date and September 4, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
