Cano v. U.S. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 6:17-cv-00951. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180424654
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMAN
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMAND..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR., District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to properly weigh and evaluate the medical opinions of the claimant's treating medical care providers; properly evaluate the claimant's credibility; consider the side effects of the claimant's medical treatment in evaluating her residual functional capacity; and properly evaluate the plaintiff's residual functional capacity, particularly in light of her psychological impairments.
FootNotes
1. A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993).
Source: Leagle
