Bradley v. Saul, 1:19-cv-00261-MR. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191112c98
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. The Plaintiff initiated this action on September 13, 2019, seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits. [Doc. 1]. Along with her Complaint, the Plaintiff filed an Application to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Doc. 2]. On September 16, 2019, the Court entered an Order denying the Plaintiff's Application with prejudice on the grounds that
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. The Plaintiff initiated this action on September 13, 2019, seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits. [Doc. 1]. Along with her Complaint, the Plaintiff filed an Application to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Doc. 2]. On September 16, 2019, the Court entered an Order denying the Plaintiff's Application with prejudice on the grounds that t..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
The Plaintiff initiated this action on September 13, 2019, seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits. [Doc. 1]. Along with her Complaint, the Plaintiff filed an Application to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Doc. 2]. On September 16, 2019, the Court entered an Order denying the Plaintiff's Application with prejudice on the grounds that the Court was unable to determine whether the Plaintiff has sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee for this action. [Doc. 3]. The Court directed the Plaintiff to file an Amended Application within thirty (30) days and specifically warned the Plaintiff that "[f]ailure to file an Amended Application within the time required will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice." [Id. at 2].
More than thirty days have passed since the entry of the Court's Order and the Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Application. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle