Dugger v. Berryhill, 5:18CV113-GCM-DCK. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190827a45
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed June 14, 2019. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, Plaintiff's objections thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and grant the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is correct and in acco
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed June 14, 2019. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, Plaintiff's objections thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and grant the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is correct and in accor..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed June 14, 2019.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, Plaintiff's objections thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and grant the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is correct and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate are accepted, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the memorandum and recommendation of the magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle