U.S. v. Baker, 6:17-cr-00035-GFVT-HAI. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20180529981
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 25, 2018
Latest Update: May 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation to Accept Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 49.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. Id. at 3. Defendant Baker has not made an objection; failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report
Summary: ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation to Accept Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 49.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. Id. at 3. Defendant Baker has not made an objection; failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report a..
More
ORDER
GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation to Accept Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 49.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. Id. at 3. Defendant Baker has not made an objection; failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation results in waiver of any further appeal to or review by the District Court and Court of Appeals as to the particular decision at issue. See Thomas v. Arn, 106 S.Ct. 466 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 950 (6th Cir. 1981).
Upon review, the Court is satisfied that Defendant Baker knowingly and competently pleaded guilty to the charged offense and that an adequate factual basis supports the plea as to each essential element of the offense charged. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1. Judge Ingram's Recommendation to Accept Guilty Plea [R. 49] is ADOPTED as and for the Opinion of the Court;
2. Defendant Joshua Baker, is ADJUDGED guilty of Count One (1) of the Indictment [R. 1];
3. The Defendant's Jury Trial is CANCELLED; and
4. A Sentencing Order shall be entered promptly.
Source: Leagle
