JORDAN v. ENSCO OFFSHORE COMPANY, 15-1226. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160524979
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 21, 2016
Latest Update: May 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin Jordan's objection to a designation of Randy McGee's deposition. 1 For the following reasons, the objection is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff objects to Page 23, line 16, through Page 24, line 15, of Mr. McGee's deposition. The testimony concerns Plaintiff's past medical treatment in relation to this accident and the Defendant's approval of and payment for such treatment. The Court finds that the testimony is i
Summary: ORDER AND REASONS SUSIE MORGAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin Jordan's objection to a designation of Randy McGee's deposition. 1 For the following reasons, the objection is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff objects to Page 23, line 16, through Page 24, line 15, of Mr. McGee's deposition. The testimony concerns Plaintiff's past medical treatment in relation to this accident and the Defendant's approval of and payment for such treatment. The Court finds that the testimony is ir..
More
ORDER AND REASONS
SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin Jordan's objection to a designation of Randy McGee's deposition.1 For the following reasons, the objection is SUSTAINED.
Plaintiff objects to Page 23, line 16, through Page 24, line 15, of Mr. McGee's deposition. The testimony concerns Plaintiff's past medical treatment in relation to this accident and the Defendant's approval of and payment for such treatment. The Court finds that the testimony is irrelevant. At the status conference on May 19, 2016, Plaintiff's counsel agreed to waive his maintenance-and-cure claims and his claims for attorneys' fees and punitive damages. Because those claims have been waived, this excerpt of Mr. McGee's deposition testimony is irrelevant, as the Defendant's approval of and payment for Plaintiff's past medical treatment is no longer an issue in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. R. Doc. 124.
Source: Leagle
