CONAWAY v. U.S., 7:00-CR-04 (HL). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140829v01
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 234). It is not necessary to address the merits of Petitioner's motion because he is not permitted to file any motions pro se while he is represented by counsel. "A district court has no obligation to entertain pro se motions filed by a represented party." Abdullah v. United States, 240 F.3d 683 , 686 (8th Cir. 2001). The Court declines to consider, and consequent
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 234). It is not necessary to address the merits of Petitioner's motion because he is not permitted to file any motions pro se while he is represented by counsel. "A district court has no obligation to entertain pro se motions filed by a represented party." Abdullah v. United States, 240 F.3d 683 , 686 (8th Cir. 2001). The Court declines to consider, and consequentl..
More
ORDER
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 234).
It is not necessary to address the merits of Petitioner's motion because he is not permitted to file any motions pro se while he is represented by counsel. "A district court has no obligation to entertain pro se motions filed by a represented party." Abdullah v. United States, 240 F.3d 683, 686 (8th Cir. 2001). The Court declines to consider, and consequently denies, Petitioner's motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
