Blazheiev v. Ubisoft Toronto Inc., 17-cv-07160-EMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181005a59
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Docket No. 86 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On August 30, 2018, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Docket No. 86. The deadline for responding to the motion was September 13, 2018 and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. In his response, Plaintiff must address the merits of Defendants' motion to dismiss. Pla
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Docket No. 86 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On August 30, 2018, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Docket No. 86. The deadline for responding to the motion was September 13, 2018 and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. In his response, Plaintiff must address the merits of Defendants' motion to dismiss. Plai..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Docket No. 86
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
On August 30, 2018, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Docket No. 86. The deadline for responding to the motion was September 13, 2018 and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. In his response, Plaintiff must address the merits of Defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is forewarned that, if he does not file a response by October 18, 2018, his case shall be dismissed with prejudice.
The motion hearing scheduled for November 8, 2018 is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
