Alexander v. Leadford, 18-100-HRW. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20191106659
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER HENRY R. WILHOIT, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 23]. The undersigned referred "all further pretrial proceedings, including preparing a proposed finding of fact and recommendations on dispositive motions" to Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [Docket No. 15]. On October 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Ingram entered his Report and Recommendation wherein he found that the Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgme
Summary: ORDER HENRY R. WILHOIT, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 23]. The undersigned referred "all further pretrial proceedings, including preparing a proposed finding of fact and recommendations on dispositive motions" to Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [Docket No. 15]. On October 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Ingram entered his Report and Recommendation wherein he found that the Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgmen..
More
ORDER
HENRY R. WILHOIT, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 23].
The undersigned referred "all further pretrial proceedings, including preparing a proposed finding of fact and recommendations on dispositive motions" to Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [Docket No. 15].
On October 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Ingram entered his Report and Recommendation wherein he found that the Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment should be sustained. [Docket No. 24].
Hearing no objections to the report and recommendation, and seeing no error in same, this Court adopts the recommendation.
Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1) that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is hereby approved and adopted as and for the opinion of the Court,
2) that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 23] be SUSTAINED;
4) the Court declines to grant a Certificate of Appealability; and
5) that this is a final and appealable order.
Source: Leagle
