United States v. Phillips, 2:18-CR-105-DBH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20191030g92
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF REGARDING RESTITUTION OBLIGATION D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The defendant has requested relief on the basis that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was treating him as owing far more restitution than he was obliged to pay, given law enforcement's recovery of money at the time they arrested the defendant. Def.'s Mot. (ECF No. 59). The government responded, stating that the BOP had now corrected its records to reduce the restitution appropriately and at
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF REGARDING RESTITUTION OBLIGATION D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The defendant has requested relief on the basis that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was treating him as owing far more restitution than he was obliged to pay, given law enforcement's recovery of money at the time they arrested the defendant. Def.'s Mot. (ECF No. 59). The government responded, stating that the BOP had now corrected its records to reduce the restitution appropriately and att..
More
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF REGARDING RESTITUTION OBLIGATION
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The defendant has requested relief on the basis that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was treating him as owing far more restitution than he was obliged to pay, given law enforcement's recovery of money at the time they arrested the defendant. Def.'s Mot. (ECF No. 59). The government responded, stating that the BOP had now corrected its records to reduce the restitution appropriately and attaching a BOP document purportedly making the correction. Gov't Response (ECF No. 61). The defendant has not replied to the government's latest filing.
Accordingly, I conclude that the mistake has been corrected and that no further court action is required.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
