Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MURDOCK, 2:11-CR-08-DBH (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20161025g26 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On August 22, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The petitioner filed his objection to the Recommended Decision on September 27, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated
More

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 22, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion. The petitioner filed his objection to the Recommended Decision on September 27, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases. The petitioner's motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer