Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Casero v. Chicago Title Insurance Company, GLR-17-2165. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Maryland Number: infdco20180214d88 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III , District Judge . Dear Counsel: Pending before the Court is Defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Order Requiring Participation in a Mediation Pending in GLR-16-2426 (ECF No. 17). For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendants' Motion. On February 7, 2018, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs Robert A. Casero, Jr. and Catherine Ma
More

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL

Dear Counsel:

Pending before the Court is Defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Order Requiring Participation in a Mediation Pending in GLR-16-2426 (ECF No. 17). For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendants' Motion.

On February 7, 2018, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs Robert A. Casero, Jr. and Catherine Mary Hattenburg's Motion to Require Defendants to Participate in Mediation. (ECF No. 15). On February 8, 2018, Defendants filed the instant Motion. (ECF No. 17). On February 12, 2018, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion for New Trial or to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 59 and 60 and affirming the Court's previous ruling that Defendants have no duty to defend Plaintiffs in the underlying suit, John S. McNulty, et al. v. Robert A. Casero, Jr., et al., GLR-16-2426 (the "Underlying Suit"). (ECF No. 19). In light of this ruling, the Court will not require Defendants to participate in a mediation in the Underlying Suit.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Order Requiring Participation in a Mediation Pending in GLR-16-2426 (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. The Court's February 7, 2018 Order (ECF No. 15) is VACATED. Defendants are not required to participate in a mediation in the Underlying Suit. Despite the informal nature of this memorandum, it shall constitute an Order of the Court, and the Clerk is directed to docket it accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer