BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, 3:13-CV-1196. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20170210h04
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2017
Summary: JURY DEMANDED IBM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL KEVIN H. SHARP , Chief District Judge . Defendant International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") moves this Court for leave to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Bridgestone's Claims, as well as exhibits 1-6 thereto under seal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and Administrative Order No. 167, Section 5.07. In support of this motion, IBM states as follows: 1. IBM's Reply in Support of
Summary: JURY DEMANDED IBM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL KEVIN H. SHARP , Chief District Judge . Defendant International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") moves this Court for leave to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Bridgestone's Claims, as well as exhibits 1-6 thereto under seal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and Administrative Order No. 167, Section 5.07. In support of this motion, IBM states as follows: 1. IBM's Reply in Support of i..
More
JURY DEMANDED
IBM'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
KEVIN H. SHARP, Chief District Judge.
Defendant International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") moves this Court for leave to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Bridgestone's Claims, as well as exhibits 1-6 thereto under seal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) and Administrative Order No. 167, Section 5.07. In support of this motion, IBM states as follows:
1. IBM's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Bridgestone's Claims, as well as exhibits 1-6 thereto contain information from documents and excerpts from deposition transcripts designated as confidential by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Bridgestone Americas, Inc. under the Amended Protected Order. See Dkt. 141.
MOTION GRANTED.
Source: Leagle