BISHOP v. BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 11-1854. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120216149
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dwight Bishop, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bishop v. Bd. of Educ. for Calvert Cnty. Pub. Schs. , No. 8:11-cv-01100-DKC (D. Md. July 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dwight Bishop, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bishop v. Bd. of Educ. for Calvert Cnty. Pub. Schs. , No. 8:11-cv-01100-DKC (D. Md. July 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately p..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Bishop, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bishop v. Bd. of Educ. for Calvert Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 8:11-cv-01100-DKC (D. Md. July 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
