JAMES v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION, 13-6595. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130826157
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment on his civil rights claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006), and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. James v. Maryland Div. of Corr.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment on his civil rights claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006), and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. James v. Maryland Div. of Corr.,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment on his civil rights claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. James v. Maryland Div. of Corr., Nos. 1:11-cv-03301-CCB, 1:11-cv-02142-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
