Threat v. Berryhill, 17-cv-11890. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180913h22
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's report and recommendation (Dkt. 17) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 16), issued August 6, 2018. The parties were required to file specific written objections to the report and recommendation within
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's report and recommendation (Dkt. 17) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 16), issued August 6, 2018. The parties were required to file specific written objections to the report and recommendation within ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's report and recommendation (Dkt. 17) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 16), issued August 6, 2018. The parties were required to file specific written objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the report and recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
The report and recommendation (Dkt. 17) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 15) is DENIED;
Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 16) is GRANTED; and
The findings of the Commissioner are ADOPTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source: Leagle
