Allen v. Town of East Longmeadow, 17-cv-30041-MGM. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20180305960
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 20) MARK G. MASTROIANNI , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court grant the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) filed by defendants, the Town of East Longmeadow, Captain Douglas Mellis, and Sergeant Patrick Manley. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that any objections to the Report and Recommendation needed to be filed within fou
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 20) MARK G. MASTROIANNI , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court grant the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) filed by defendants, the Town of East Longmeadow, Captain Douglas Mellis, and Sergeant Patrick Manley. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that any objections to the Report and Recommendation needed to be filed within four..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
(Dkt. No. 20)
MARK G. MASTROIANNI, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court grant the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) filed by defendants, the Town of East Longmeadow, Captain Douglas Mellis, and Sergeant Patrick Manley. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that any objections to the Report and Recommendation needed to be filed within fourteen days. No objections have been filed.
Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 36.) Based upon this, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. The federal claims asserted in Counts One, Two, and Three are dismissed with prejudice. The state law negligence claims asserted in Counts One and Two are dismissed without prejudice. This case may now be closed.
It is So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
