McATEER v. KING, 2:09-cv-361-TMH (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120427b49
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER TRUMAN M. HOBBS, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Denial (Doc. #101) filed on April 25, 2012. Specifically, plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's order of April 18, 2012 (Doc. #100) denying his motion for admonishment and/or sanctions. After an independent review of the plaintiff's motion, the Magistrate Judge's order, and the plaintiff's objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order is neither clearly
Summary: ORDER TRUMAN M. HOBBS, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Denial (Doc. #101) filed on April 25, 2012. Specifically, plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's order of April 18, 2012 (Doc. #100) denying his motion for admonishment and/or sanctions. After an independent review of the plaintiff's motion, the Magistrate Judge's order, and the plaintiff's objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order is neither clearly e..
More
ORDER
TRUMAN M. HOBBS, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Denial (Doc. #101) filed on April 25, 2012. Specifically, plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's order of April 18, 2012 (Doc. #100) denying his motion for admonishment and/or sanctions. After an independent review of the plaintiff's motion, the Magistrate Judge's order, and the plaintiff's objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's objection (Doc. #101) is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate action.
Source: Leagle
