U.S. v. WARDEN, 1:16-cr-00037-JTN-7. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160408p31
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER PHILLIP J. GREEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant's detention on two bases: (1) that he poses a danger to other persons in the community, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(1); and (2) that he poses a serious risk of flight. 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing today at which defendant was represented by counsel. The Court has also considered the information contai
Summary: ORDER PHILLIP J. GREEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant's detention on two bases: (1) that he poses a danger to other persons in the community, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(1); and (2) that he poses a serious risk of flight. 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing today at which defendant was represented by counsel. The Court has also considered the information contain..
More
ORDER
PHILLIP J. GREEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant's detention on two bases: (1) that he poses a danger to other persons in the community, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1); and (2) that he poses a serious risk of flight. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing today at which defendant was represented by counsel. The Court has also considered the information contained in the Pretrial Services Report. (ECF No. 294).
For the reasons stated on the record, the Court finds that the government has met its burden of establishing that defendant poses a danger to the community and that he presents a serious risk of flight. The Court also finds, as explained on the record, that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will ensure the safety of other persons in the community and defendant's appearance. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General pending further order of this Court.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle