Hardeway v. Colonagosta, 6:18-CV-01620. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190916429
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS , District Judge . The Judgment issued by the Court on September 9, 2019 [Doc. No. 34] is VACATED. 1 For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendant Ja
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS , District Judge . The Judgment issued by the Court on September 9, 2019 [Doc. No. 34] is VACATED. 1 For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendant Jam..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS, District Judge.
The Judgment issued by the Court on September 9, 2019 [Doc. No. 34] is VACATED.1
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendant James P. Doherty, Jr [Rec. Doc. 12] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Joshua Francis Hardeway's claim against him is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED.
FootNotes
1. The Court's prior Judgment noted the absence of Objections to the Report and Recommendation. On September 11, 2019, Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation were docketed by the Clerk of Court. The objections are dated September 6, 2019. At the time the Court issued its Judgment, it failed to notice Plaintiff does not receive e-mail notice of entry of documents. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections are timely. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).
Source: Leagle
