INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING CORPORATION v. SOFIR ITALIA S.R.L., 16-cv-13168. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170221g31
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS SOFIR ITALIA S.R.L., ALVARO FREGOLENT, AND MARCO FERGANI'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 13) WITHOUT PREJUDICE, GRANTING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 2), AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . In accordance with this Court's order (Dkt. 14), Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (Dkt. 16). Therefore, the Court denies Defendants Sofir Italia s.r.l., Alvaro Fregolent, and Marco Vergani's mo
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS SOFIR ITALIA S.R.L., ALVARO FREGOLENT, AND MARCO FERGANI'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 13) WITHOUT PREJUDICE, GRANTING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 2), AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . In accordance with this Court's order (Dkt. 14), Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (Dkt. 16). Therefore, the Court denies Defendants Sofir Italia s.r.l., Alvaro Fregolent, and Marco Vergani's mot..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS SOFIR ITALIA S.R.L., ALVARO FREGOLENT, AND MARCO FERGANI'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 13) WITHOUT PREJUDICE, GRANTING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 2), AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT SOFIR N.A. CO. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.
In accordance with this Court's order (Dkt. 14), Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (Dkt. 16). Therefore, the Court denies Defendants Sofir Italia s.r.l., Alvaro Fregolent, and Marco Vergani's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 13) without prejudice.
Defendant Sofir N.A. Co. had also filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. 2), which the Court grants. Plaintiff agreed to the dismissal, but asked that it be without prejudice. Sofir N.A. Co. argued that the dismissal should be with prejudice. Based on the allegations in the original complaint (Dkt. 1), the Court is unable to determine that no cause of action could be asserted against Sofir N.A. Co. Because Plaintiff is content to call a cease-fire at this time, the better course is to dismiss the claims against Sofir N.A. Co. without prejudice and leave to another day, if that day should arrive, whether claims can be asserted and whether costs should be assessed against Plaintiff for renewing the claims if it decides to do so. Therefore, the dismissal of Sofir N.A. Co. is without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
