Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOLDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14-14877. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151110g50 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 18) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 13) AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 16) AND REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AVERN COHN , District Judge . I. This is a social security case. Plaintiff Kenneth Holden appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that he is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance b
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 18) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 13) AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 16) AND REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

I.

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Kenneth Holden appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that he is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff requested that the Commissioner's decision be remanded for further proceedings.

The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that plaintiff's motion be granted and the Commissioner's motion be denied and the matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 18)

II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the MJRR.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer