TADDEO v. AMERICAN INVSCO CORPORATION, 2:12-cv-01110-APG-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160317833
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Koval Flamingo, LLC moved for reconsideration of my Order (Dkt. #260) denying the defendants' post-trial motions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59. (Dkt. #269.) After Koval filed the motion for reconsideration but before the plaintiffs responded, Koval filed a notice of appeal. (Dkt. #273.) The parties did not continue briefing the matter, presumably because I was divested of jurisdiction when Ko
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Koval Flamingo, LLC moved for reconsideration of my Order (Dkt. #260) denying the defendants' post-trial motions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59. (Dkt. #269.) After Koval filed the motion for reconsideration but before the plaintiffs responded, Koval filed a notice of appeal. (Dkt. #273.) The parties did not continue briefing the matter, presumably because I was divested of jurisdiction when Kov..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant Koval Flamingo, LLC moved for reconsideration of my Order (Dkt. #260) denying the defendants' post-trial motions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59. (Dkt. #269.) After Koval filed the motion for reconsideration but before the plaintiffs responded, Koval filed a notice of appeal. (Dkt. #273.) The parties did not continue briefing the matter, presumably because I was divested of jurisdiction when Koval filed the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4.
Although I lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion for reconsideration, I issued an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 indicating that Koval's motion raises a substantial issue. (Dkt. #314.) The Ninth Circuit subsequently granted Koval's motion for a limited remand so that I would have jurisdiction to address the motion for reconsideration. (Dkt. #332-1.) The parties previously did not complete briefing on the motion for reconsideration, so the following briefing schedule will apply. The plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion for reconsideration (Dkt. #269) within 14 days of the date of this Order and Koval shall file a reply seven days thereafter.
Source: Leagle
