Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DAVIS v. ASTRUE, 10-4412. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20120217927 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. The Court, having reviewed de novo the complaint, 1 the pro se plaintiff's letter brief, 2 the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, 3 the applicable law, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, 4 hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly, plaintiff's letter brief is DENIED, defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Davis's petition for re
More

ORDER

SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.

The Court, having reviewed de novo the complaint,1 the pro se plaintiff's letter brief,2 the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment,3 the applicable law, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation,4 hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein.

Accordingly, plaintiff's letter brief is DENIED, defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Davis's petition for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

FootNotes


1. R. Doc. 2.
2. R. Doc. 12.
3. R. Doc. 14.
4. R. Doc. 15.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer