Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Harper, 11-20188. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180312a82 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [DOC 298] GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on defendant Frank Harper's motion for certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. 2253(c) and 28 U.S.C. 2255. On February 8, 2018, this court entered its Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct His Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability as it is required to do purs
More

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [DOC 298]

This matter comes before the court on defendant Frank Harper's motion for certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On February 8, 2018, this court entered its Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct His Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability as it is required to do pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Defendant in this case has made no such showing. For this reason, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

So ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer