LaPLANTE v. LOVELACE, 2:13-CV-32. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150310d15
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . On February 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 71, 76) be granted and that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner civil rights complaint be dismissed in its entirety. (ECF No. 100.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the
Summary: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . On February 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 71, 76) be granted and that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner civil rights complaint be dismissed in its entirety. (ECF No. 100.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the ..
More
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
On February 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 71, 76) be granted and that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights complaint be dismissed in its entirety. (ECF No. 100.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 100) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 71, 76) are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) that an appeal of this action would not be in good faith.
Source: Leagle
