United States v. Roman, 2:08-CR-00227. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190913890
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES D. CAIN, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 83] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, with the undersigned having determined that the findings are correct under the applicable law and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation filed in the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the instant 2255 Motion [doc. 79] be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the Motions f
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES D. CAIN, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 83] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, with the undersigned having determined that the findings are correct under the applicable law and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation filed in the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the instant 2255 Motion [doc. 79] be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the Motions fo..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES D. CAIN, JR., District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 83] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, with the undersigned having determined that the findings are correct under the applicable law and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation filed in the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the instant § 2255 Motion [doc. 79] be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the Motions for Evidentiary Hearing and Court-Appointed Counsel [doc. 80] be DENIED.
Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. After considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2253, the court denies a certificate of appealability because the movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Source: Leagle
