Green v. Commissioner of Social Security, 17-13528. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190311a42
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARIANNE O. BATTANI , District Judge . Plaintiff Sytaira Green brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405 (g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her claim for disability benefits. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) to review the final decision. The p
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARIANNE O. BATTANI , District Judge . Plaintiff Sytaira Green brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405 (g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her claim for disability benefits. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) to review the final decision. The pa..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sytaira Green brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her claim for disability benefits. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) to review the final decision.
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated January 31, 2019, Magistrate Judge Davis recommended that Defendant's motion be granted and Plaintiff's motion be denied. In her R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R needed to be filed within 14 days of service and that a party's failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (ECF No. 12 at Page 19).
Neither party filed an objection. Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to de novo review and appeal. Moreover, this Court agrees with the thorough analysis contained in the R&R.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
