United States v. Jones, 4:18-CR-00188-DGK-1. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20200309929
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS GREG KAYS , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant Donzell A. Jones's pro se motion to dismiss (Doc. 128), the Government's suggestions in opposition (Doc. 131), Defendant's reply (Doc. 133), and U.S. Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 147). Defendant did not object to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); Local Rule 74.1(a)(2). After caref
Summary: ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS GREG KAYS , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant Donzell A. Jones's pro se motion to dismiss (Doc. 128), the Government's suggestions in opposition (Doc. 131), Defendant's reply (Doc. 133), and U.S. Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 147). Defendant did not object to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); Local Rule 74.1(a)(2). After carefu..
More
ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS
GREG KAYS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Donzell A. Jones's pro se motion to dismiss (Doc. 128), the Government's suggestions in opposition (Doc. 131), Defendant's reply (Doc. 133), and U.S. Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 147). Defendant did not object to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Local Rule 74.1(a)(2).
After carefully reviewing the Magistrate's report and conducting an independent review of the record and applicable law, see L.R. 74.1(b), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DENIES Defendant's amended motion to dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
