Dandridge v. U.S., 2:07-cr-129-MPM. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20180412b63
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL P. MILLS , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the pro se motion of Christopher Vashun Dandridge to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. ECF doc. 27. Dandridge has since filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his 2255 motion because "[b]ased on Fifth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent, defense counsel believes it is in Mr. Dandridge's best interest to voluntarily withdraw his motion. . . ." ECF docs.
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL P. MILLS , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the pro se motion of Christopher Vashun Dandridge to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. ECF doc. 27. Dandridge has since filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his 2255 motion because "[b]ased on Fifth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent, defense counsel believes it is in Mr. Dandridge's best interest to voluntarily withdraw his motion. . . ." ECF docs. 3..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the pro se motion of Christopher Vashun Dandridge to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF doc. 27. Dandridge has since filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his § 2255 motion because "[b]ased on Fifth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent, defense counsel believes it is in Mr. Dandridge's best interest to voluntarily withdraw his motion. . . ." ECF docs. 30,31. After due consideration, the motion to dismiss will be granted and the § 2255 motion dismissed without prejudice. A final judgment consistent with this memorandum opinion will issue today.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
