IDUSOGIE v. THE MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, 10-4483 (MJD/FLN). (2011)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20110725663
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2011
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel dated June 29, 2011. [Docket No. 90] Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of the Magistrate Judge's disposition. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Re
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel dated June 29, 2011. [Docket No. 90] Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of the Magistrate Judge's disposition. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Rec..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel dated June 29, 2011. [Docket No. 90] Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of the Magistrate Judge's disposition. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Noel dated June 29, 2011.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel dated June 29, 2011 [Docket No. 90].
2. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Docket Nos. 5, 17, 24, 34, 39, 59, 64, 79] are GRANTED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
