U.S. v. SIDIE, 8:14CR225. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141020768
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant Jmie Trujillo's unopposed motion for continuance of trial [76] as defendant has recently entered a treatment facility and needs addition time to complete the program. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion for continuance of trial [76] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defend
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant Jmie Trujillo's unopposed motion for continuance of trial [76] as defendant has recently entered a treatment facility and needs addition time to complete the program. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion for continuance of trial [76] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defenda..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Jmie Trujillo's unopposed motion for continuance of trial [76] as defendant has recently entered a treatment facility and needs addition time to complete the program. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for continuance of trial [76] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for November 4, 2014 is continued to January 6, 2015.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and January 6, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
