Washington v. Smith, 17-5054 (DWF/SER). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20180718a97
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated June 29, 2018. (Doc. No. 16.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated June 29, 2018. (Doc. No. 16.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated June 29, 2018. (Doc. No. 16.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's June 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [16]) is ADOPTED.
2. Keith Eugene Washington's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. No. [1]) is DENIED.
3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. No certificate of appealability is issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
