SHAW v. HAMMER, 15-CV-2530 (PJS/SER). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20150625d28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ , District Judge . The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Terelle Eugene Shaw's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] be DENIED. 2. This action be DISMISSED. 3. Shaw's application to proceed in forma pauperis
Summary: ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ , District Judge . The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Terelle Eugene Shaw's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] be DENIED. 2. This action be DISMISSED. 3. Shaw's application to proceed in forma pauperis [..
More
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner Terelle Eugene Shaw's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] be DENIED.
2. This action be DISMISSED.
3. Shaw's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] be DENIED AS MOOT.
4. No certificate of appealability be granted.
Source: Leagle
